Critical Reasoning Questions For CLAT 2025

Critical thinking is the ability to think clearly and rationally while comprehending the logical relationship between ideas. In essence, critical thinking necessitates the use of logic. It’s about being a participant rather than a bystander in learning. Instead of accepting ideas and assumptions at face value, critical thinkers question them thoroughly. They will always try to figure out whether the ideas, arguments, and discoveries represent the whole picture, and they are prepared to be surprised if they don’t.

Critical Reasoning Questions For CLAT 2025

Rather than relying on intuition or instinct, critical thinkers will discover, analyze, and solve problems systematically. This is a highly desired talent in management and law, where data analysis for clients necessitates being factual and analytical. This is why, in other countries, critical reasoning problems are a key component of aptitude exams, and the CLAT consortium is currently moving in that direction.

[Download Free Study Material  For CLAT 2025 by LegalEdge]

The CLAT test includes critical reasoning problems in both the verbal and logical reasoning parts. The exam could include anything from 20 to 35 critical reasoning and skills-based questions.


What are Critical Reasoning Questions in CLAT 2025?

Critical reasoning questions involve things like making an argument, making an assumption, identifying an argument’s assumption, evaluating the argument, and coming to a conclusion.

Some of the key themes for CLAT critical reasoning are as follows:

  • Statement and Argument
  • Statement and Assumption
  • Statement and Conclusion
  • Statement and Course of Action
  • Cause and Effects

Download Number System Questions For CLAT 2025

Types of Critical Reasoning Questions for CLAT 2025

Some of the numerous sorts of critical reasoning problems that may arise in the forthcoming exam are as follows:

  • Weaken the Argument
  • Strengthen the Argument
  • Supply the Assumption
  • Supply the Conclusion
  • Structure of the Argument
  • The flaw in the Argument
  • Paradox Questions
  • Evaluate the Conclusion

Download Idioms and Phrases For CLAT 2025

How to Solve CLAT Critical Reasoning Questions with Examples

Several competitive exams have Critical Reasoning as a component. To enhance your score and accuracy on critical thinking problems, go through the key concepts and techniques.

Common Terms used in Critical Reasoning:

Argument: An argument is a collection of statements, one of which is the conclusion, another is the facts, and the third is the assumptions, all of which support the conclusion. To enhance or weaken an argument, one must support or refute an underlying assumption about the question at hand.

Conclusion: The primary point of an argument is the conclusion, which is founded on facts.

Premises or facts: a premise or fact is a piece of evidence that is provided to support a conclusion.

Assumption: hidden or implicit information that supports the conclusion.

Inference: An inference is a conclusion or interpretation drawn from a given statement. To find a conclusion or inference, we must first extract keywords from the given sentence, which we may then look up in the response alternatives.

Approach to Critical Reasoning Questions:


  1. Divide the CR text into sections.

If you’re having trouble understanding the passage, break it down into smaller chunks. Determine the conclusion, facts, and hypotheses. This will aid comprehension of the passage while applying the structural technique to solve it.

  1. Be wary of answer options that are in direct opposition to the question’s basic theme.

Always read the question attentively and be aware of the questions it poses. If the question is, “Which of the following weakens the argument?” then there will undoubtedly be one answer that strengthens the case. Be wary of such responses; they are designed to perplex students. If you use this approach with caution, you will be able to avoid a lot of erroneous responses, thereby improving your score.

  1. Reword passages to make them easier to understand.

Critical reasoning passages are always written in a difficult and perplexing manner. As a result, it is preferable to simplify the terminology for your own sake. That way, you’ll have a better understanding of the question and will be able to break it down and remove any irrelevant information that can obstruct your search for the correct answer.

  1. Comprehend the question

Many times, students are perplexed as to what is being asked in the question; therefore, it is critical to comprehend the question; otherwise, we are prone to marking the incorrect answer.

CLAT Critical Reasoning Sample Questions:


Statement/Conclusion: The city of Chandigarh is a wonderful place to visit.

Which of the following, if true, would support the preceding statement the most?”

  1. Chandigarh has a plethora of excellent art galleries.
  2. Patiala boasts a plethora of excellent restaurants.

Solution: People are occasionally perplexed as to whether they should examine whether the options are true or not. You are not obligated to do so. You can suppose that all of the possibilities are correct. You don’t have to wonder whether Patiala does have a lot of fantastic eateries. Option I is the correct response because it is the only one that applies to Chandigarh.

Statement: Yesterday’s severe accident, in which a person was run down by a car, has once again brought attention to the worst state of roads.


  1. There was a deadly accident that occurred.
  2. Several accidents have occurred as a result of the poor quality of the roads.

Solution: Both I and II are correct answers because both may be deduced or driven from the given statement. The essential terms for the first conclusion are ‘run down,’ whereas the keywords for the second conclusion are ‘unsatisfactory state of roads.’

Claim: The jade plant has thick leaves and doesn’t need much water.


  1. All plants with thick leaves require little water.
  2. The jade plant can be grown in areas where there is a scarcity of water.

Solution: Only II should be chosen because I refer to all plants, whereas only the Jade plant is mentioned in the provided statement.

Statement: The growing popularity of Ayurvedic remedies in the west is the best evidence of India’s magnificent history.


  1. In India, Ayurvedic medications are not widely used.
  2. In India, allopathic drugs are more popular.

Solution: Because both I and II cannot be driven out of the given statement, the answer option in this situation will be ‘none of the conclusions can be reached.’ Statement I contradicts the previous statement, and Statement II is out of context.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q: What is the best way to prepare for the CLAT critical reasoning section?

A: It's crucial to look over the entire curriculum before developing a study schedule. Allow at least 1-2 hours of study time for each critical reasoning topic in the study plan. If you are already knowledgeable about a subject, devote less attention to it. Instead, focus on the subject in which you are weak. In addition, the study schedule must contain at least 45 minutes of daily newspaper reading.

Q: Which books should you read to prepare for the CLAT's critical reasoning section?

A: Jain Prateek's Universal's Logical Reasoning for CLAT, LSAT, and Other Law Entrance Exams and RS Aggarwal's Verbal Reasoning.

Q: What is the best way to prepare for the CLAT critical reasoning section?

A: Clear your notions and grasp the fundamentals of the topics covered within the course. Refer to well-reviewed and well-liked books. You must learn to manage your time well. You can accomplish this by keeping track of how long it takes you to complete practice question sheets. Regularly, practice thoroughly and solve as many mock exam papers and previous year papers as possible.

Q: What can I do to improve my critical reasoning accuracy on the CLAT?

A: By solving as many example papers as possible, you can rapidly improve your speed and accuracy. Practicing fake tests will also help you improve your time management and problem-solving skills.

Q: Is CLAT Critical Reasoning Preparation in One Month Possible?

A: Yes, CLAT Logical Reasoning Preparation can be completed in less than one month. Make certain to go through the entire syllabus, including the most crucial sections. Revise frequently and answer question papers that cover the syllabus's contents. These will be sufficient to pass the section.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.