How To Write A Case Study In Law Exam

Writing a case study can be a challenging task for law students as it requires a lot of thinking. The situation gets worse when you have to write a case study for a law exam. As it is a part and parcel of law exams, it is impossible to evade it. Hence, you should do everything possible to master this subject and write it excellently.

How To Write A Case Study In Law Exam

To curate any case study, you should consider the following facts:

In-depth analysis: You should study a subject in-depth which is quintessential. Deep analysis of a subject ensures that you don’t miss out on any part of the subject unturned.

Take Notes: It is always important to note down the important points and facts of the subject that you study.

Gather facts: To ensure the accuracy of your study, it is necessary that you make a note of the facts.

Get perfect solutions: Your first step is to identify the problem and look out for ways to get perfect solutions.

A law case study is a detailed and intensive study of a person, group, or social phenomenon. Usually, you conduct a study on a case that is solved by a judge. It investigates a problem, analyses solutions with supporting evidence. A case study helps you determine the success or failure of a case. You can use the law to solve various case scenarios. Check civil judge salary.

While you have an overview of case studies in law exams, now it’s time to understand how to write a case study in a law exam.

How to write a case study in a law exam?

Read to understand

Once you identify the case, the next step is to study the case. You need to check if your case meets the following criteria:

  • Provides insights into the subject you are studying.
  • Challenge the existing theories.

To write a case study, the candidate should have proper knowledge of the subject. The candidate should read the case study opinions and facts, later analyze the situation carefully. He/she should take short notes and highlight the points that are important.

Concentrate on Analysis

While analyzing, the candidate should focus on 2 to 5 fundamental problems of the case. It can include questions like Why do they exist? What are the impacts, and who’s responsible for these problems? At the start of the paragraph, the candidate should introduce the protagonists, then include the topic of the case.

Describe the synopsis

Drafting a summary of the case is important to completely understand the case. The candidate should describe all the characters of the story chronologically and also the problems included.

Curate the best solutions

Candidates should perform trial and error methods to find the best solutions that fit the problem. Reviewing course readings, recalling discussions, and candidates’ own experiences can help find the best solutions. Brainstorming is one of the best possible ways to find the solution.

Choose the Best solution

In the brainstorming session list out all the possible solutions and choose the best one. To choose the best, the candidate should examine the strengths and weaknesses of the answers listed. Considering strong evidence and its pros and cons can help in finding the right solution.

Use IRAC rule

IRAC stands for Issue, the Rule of Law, Analysis, and Conclusion. In this method, the candidate should first discover and identify issues in the case. Let’s understand each part of the rule below:

Issue

Issues will not be visible sometimes, so the candidate should look for the issue carefully. Problems vary based on the matter for example they include negligence, malpractice, abuse of power, several liabilities, amongst other subjects. One case can have several issues, so it’s better to discuss the problems separately. Before moving ahead, the candidate should confirm if he/she has spotted the issue that the model writer intended.

The Rule of Law

The candidate should determine the rule of law that should be incorporated in the case study. For every issue discovered, the candidate should find the best rule of law. Ensure that they are relevant. There is no need to note down every rule of law while writing a case study. The candidate should only review each rule of law cautiously.

Analysis

The candidate should analyze the case study to discover the possible solutions to the problem. He/she should relate the practical part with the theory part while writing a case study in the law exam. The candidate should not only suggest a solution but also present some facts to support the suggested solutions.

The candidate should ensure that they have chosen a relevant rule of law. After selecting the rule of law, they can apply it to the situations discovered. The candidate should make lawyerly arguments on behalf of the defendant and also the plaintiff. Imagining what the plaintiff would argue and what the defendant would say on their part will help analyze the case study.

The candidate should be more creative while making any arguments. Candidates should argue based on the facts and how they integrate them in one way or another. Also, the candidate can state the policy reason and why the case should turn one way and not the other. Candidates can also argue based on why one should use the model rule instead of the traditional rule.

Conclusion

The conclusion is the final part of writing a case study. It should be based on the reasons why the issue was raised based on the rule of law and use the judgment of relevant use case laws. While finalizing the case study, the candidate should write the final verdict of each situation. Preferably, the candidate can state that the plaintiff is likely to win for the defendant.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q). What is the full form of IRAC?

A). IRAC stands for Issue, the Rule of Law, Analysis, and Conclusion.

Q). How to choose the best solution to a problem?

A). To choose the best, the candidate should examine the strengths and weaknesses of the answers listed. Considering strong evidence and its pros and cons can help in finding the right solution.

Q). How to find the problems?

A). While analyzing, the candidate should focus on 2 to 5 fundamental problems of the case. It can include questions like Why do they exist? What are the impacts, and who's responsible for these problems?

Q). Why is in-depth analysis necessary?

A). Deep analysis of a subject ensures that you don’t miss out on any part of the subject unturned.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *